Subscribe

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Halo or aeroscreen? Autosport readers pick which is best

Many Formula 1 fans have been vocal in their disapproval of the halo ahead of its introduction for this season, while IndyCar continues to pursue an alternative solution

IndyCar's aeroscreen made its on-track debut last week at Phoenix, with four-time champion Scott Dixon's feedback largely positive.

When F1 tried a similar concept last year it was quickly parked after a negative reaction from Sebastian Vettel at Silverstone, resulting in the halo getting the nod for 2018.

With the two major single-seater championships taking different approaches to cockpit safety, we asked for your opinion on Twitter about which is best.

Here is a selection from the huge number of responses we received:

@StuartBorland: While the screen is aesthetically more pleasing, I think the halo is much more up to the job it was designed for.

@adammharvey: Halo is horrendous. I've been watching for 35 years, & this is the first season I've been 'meh' about in a long, long time. Aesthetics (and driver safety) are important - this is going to cause problems...

@hstamoose: Gotta admit, if I hadn't seen the awful halo first, I would not have liked the shield near as well as I do now!

@jordiradstake: The screen looks like it's made to go faster. The halo looks like it's made to go slower.

@dhartriesel: Both are just intermediate solutions until a full enclosure of the cockpit is implemented for formula cars in the future. But between halo and screen, the screen looks definitely better.

@read_read47: Try again F1, ignore Vettel next time

@dizzy_ska: Although I think the halo isn't as bad as people hype it to be, I prefer a screen. But whatever they use, it has to be tested and definitely be working by the time they use it in a race

@Nat_Turner1831: Even though the screen looks better I think the halo will give the driver more comfort with having the airflow to cool him down.

@neesam709: If we really must have cockpit protection then it has to be the screen

@PhilBygrave: I don't like either of them but if it has to be one of them, I would choose the screen! The halo is just plain ugly and at some point I'm certain there will be a blind spot incident.

@cory_f1: Aesthetically the screen, but what happens when it gets dirty - bit difficult for the driver to pull a tear-off from it

@mattbuck4950: In principle the screen. But halo is tested now, screen isn't, and it's important to get it into use as quickly as possible to prevent further injuries.

@Deej_44: Easily the halo. The screen would have a massive impact on aero and that matters more than aesthetics for me. The screen also looks hideous anyway.

Be part of the Autosport community

Join the conversation
Previous article IndyCar says Phoenix aeroscreen test 'exceeded expectations'
Next article IndyCar plans street course testing with windscreen cockpit device

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe