Sebastian Vettel Baku FIA case: Four key questions after the verdict

The FIA's decision to not take further action against Sebastian Vettel for his clash with Lewis Hamilton at the Azerbaijan Grand Prix has proved almost as controversial as the incident itself

Sebastian Vettel Baku FIA case: Four key questions after the verdict

On one side of the debate are those who think Vettel has got away with his actions simply because of a late apology, and on the other side are those who believed that the German already served his punishment in Baku so F1 is right to forgive, forget and move on.

Regardless of the various opinions floating around, the clash with Hamilton and the fallout over the last week has brought up some big issues that should be addressed.

SHOULD 'SORRY' BE THE EASIEST WORD?

The key thrust of the reasoning for FIA president Jean Todt's decision to draw a line under the matter was that Vettel admitted full responsibility and apologised for what happened.

But should saying sorry - especially when that regret comes only after you are at risk of further sanctions - be enough?

On Sunday night in Baku neither Vettel nor Ferrari showed any remorse for what happened, and even questioned the decision to get a penalty at all.

Vettel apologises for 'dangerous overreaction'

But precedent would now seem to suggest that saying sorry is enough to escape punishments, with Vettel having also been let off for his outburst against Charlie Whiting at least year's Mexican Grand Prix in light an apology he made after that race.

The FIA could find itself in a tricky situation in the future if drivers view these two Vettel affairs as a green light to behave as they want on track, if they know that simply apologising afterwards is enough to escape a slap over the wrists.

IS IT TIME FOR AN OVERHAUL?

One of the reasons why the FIA may have preferred to avoid taking the matter to its International Tribunal is that it would have opened up a lengthy legal process that would have overshadowed F1 for the next few months.

The processes laid down in FIA statutes state that if a Tribunal hearing is called and charges are brought against a competitor, then there is a 15-day time frame for the accused to respond, another 15-day time frame for the prosecutor to reply, and then a further 15-days before a hearing can begin.

Even after the hearing, there then remains the possibility of the matter going to the International Court of Appeal which could take several more weeks.

In a worst-case scenario, this affair could have dragged on until late summer.

That prompts the question about whether there is a case for the FIA's disciplinary process to change, especially when it comes to incidents like Vettel's Mexican GP outburst and the Baku safety car swipe.

Should there be the creation of some form of panel of experts that could be brought into play to make fast-track judgements on the rare occasions when controversial incidents prompt a post-race investigation?

DOES F1 NEED MORE TRANSPARENCY?

The Vettel incident in Baku has served to divide F1's fanbase, with almost everyone having a strong opinion about who was right and who was wrong.

But the situation has not been helped by the lack of a full explanation behind many of the decisions made from the moment the incident happened.

The full telemetry readings that the FIA based its initial reasoning that Hamilton did not brake test Vettel should have been released to prove that the Mercedes driver was innocent.

And what was the official reasoning for Vettel not getting a black flag in Baku - was it really because he was fighting for the championship, or were there other factors at play?

Too much mystery surrounded Monday's hearing too, with the FIA not willing to release details of who was going to be present at the meeting. Why also only have Vettel and Ferrari present and not Hamilton as the afflicted party?

There has not yet been an explanation of why an apology is enough when the whole reason the investigation was called in the first place was because of fears about the impact the incident could have on motor racing's image and reputation.

It was little wonder then that, in light of such a wall of silence, that a 'fake news' FIA press release (declaring Vettel was excluded from the Baku race) was able to get traction on social media on Monday and even get picked up by some national newspapers as being official.

F1 needs to do more to give all the facts to fans so they can form well-considered opinions.

IS IT TIME FOR F1 TO MOVE ON?

In sporting terms, absolutely. Whatever the rights and wrongs of the FIA's decision and what Vettel did in Azerbaijan, the incident should not be allowed to overshadow what is turning out to be a fantastic F1 campaign.

Let's also not forget that Vettel did not get away scot-free. He was given a 10-second stop-go penalty and had three disciplinary points added on to his superlicence. If he gets three more points at this weekend's Austrian Grand Prix, then it will mean a race ban for Silverstone.

The Baku incident and its fallout has not robbed us of any sporting spectacle in future races - in fact it has added an edge to the campaign that wasn't there before when Vettel and Hamilton were initially locked in some kind of 'bromance' about their mutual respect for each other.

Sport thrives when there is a proper head-to-head and passions are raised, although sporting fairness must always take precedent.

Let's hope lessons about overreacting have really been learned and that Hamilton-Vettel duel becomes one for all of us to behold.

Judging by the huge interest that the Vettel affair has driven, there are going to be plenty of eyeballs on F1 for the next few races, and that is something we can at least all celebrate together.

shares
comments
Ferrari more aggressive than Mercedes with British GP tyre choices
Previous article

Ferrari more aggressive than Mercedes with British GP tyre choices

Next article

What are Alonso's options for 2018?

What are Alonso's options for 2018?
Load comments
Unpacking the technical changes behind F1 2022's rules shakeup Plus

Unpacking the technical changes behind F1 2022's rules shakeup

Formula 1 cars will look very different this year as the long-awaited fresh rules finally arrive with the stated aim of improving its quality of racing. Autosport breaks down what the return of 'ground effect' aerodynamics - and a flurry of other changes besides - means for the teams, and what fans can expect

Why new era F1 is still dogged by its old world problems Plus

Why new era F1 is still dogged by its old world problems

OPINION: The 2022 Formula 1 season is just weeks away from getting underway. But instead of focusing on what is to come, the attention still remains on what has been – not least the Abu Dhabi title decider controversy. That, plus other key talking points, must be resolved to allow the series to warmly welcome in its new era

Formula 1
Jan 20, 2022
The Schumacher trait that will give Haas hope in F1 2022 Plus

The Schumacher trait that will give Haas hope in F1 2022

Mick Schumacher’s knack of improving during his second season in a championship was a trademark of his junior formula career, so his progress during his rookie Formula 1 campaign with Haas was encouraging. His target now will be to turn that improvement into results as the team hopes to reap the rewards of sacrificing development in 2021

Formula 1
Jan 19, 2022
The “glorified taxi” driver central to F1’s continued safety push Plus

The “glorified taxi” driver central to F1’s continued safety push

As the driver of Formula 1’s medical car, Alan van der Merwe’s job is to wait – and hope his skills aren’t needed. JAMES NEWBOLD hears from F1’s lesser-known stalwarts

Formula 1
Jan 15, 2022
When BMW added F1 'rocket fuel' to ignite Brabham's 1983 title push Plus

When BMW added F1 'rocket fuel' to ignite Brabham's 1983 title push

There was an ace up the sleeve during the 1983 F1 title-winning season of Nelson Piquet and Brabham. It made a frontrunning car invincible for the last three races to see off Renault's Alain Prost and secure the combination's second world title in three years

Formula 1
Jan 13, 2022
How “abysmal” reliability blunted Brabham’s first winner Plus

How “abysmal” reliability blunted Brabham’s first winner

Brabham’s first world championship race-winning car was held back by unreliable Climax engines – or so its creators believed, as STUART CODLING explains

Formula 1
Jan 10, 2022
The steps Norris took to reach a new level in F1 2021 Plus

The steps Norris took to reach a new level in F1 2021

Lando Norris came of age as a grand prix driver in 2021. McLaren’s young ace is no longer an apprentice or a quietly capable number two – he’s proved himself a potential winner in the top flight and, as STUART CODLING finds out, he’s ready to stake his claim to greatness…

Formula 1
Jan 9, 2022
The original F1 maestro who set the bar for Schumacher and Hamilton Plus

The original F1 maestro who set the bar for Schumacher and Hamilton

Juan Manuel Fangio, peerless on track and charming off it, established the gold standard of grand prix greatness. NIGEL ROEBUCK recalls a remarkable champion

Formula 1
Jan 8, 2022