Russell: Reduced F1 slipstream effect could compromise passing
Mercedes driver George Russell says a reduced slipstream effect generated by the 2022 Formula 1 cars could make it harder to successfully complete an overtaking move.
Photo by: Mercedes AMG
After testing the new cars in Barcelona, drivers have reported that as planned the new aero package has made it easier to follow other cars through a corner and onto a straight.
However, Russell says that the aero characteristics of the new cars generate a tow that is less powerful, and thus it could potentially be harder to take full advantage of being able to stay behind the car ahead and attempt a move.
“I think the following has been improved,” said Russell when asked by Autosport about the 2022 cars.
“But the slipstream effect has been reduced quite substantially, I think.
“So, I don’t really know. You obviously need that delta on the straight to be able to overtake because you can only really overtake at the end of the straight into the corner.
“I think we can follow closer, but from what we’ve seen, the slipstream effect is definitely less effective. So, we’ll have to wait and see.
“I got right up behind Lando [Norris] and I was a car length or two behind him, and I didn’t catch him down the straights. So that was slightly concerning. But, let’s see.”
Lando Norris, McLaren MCL36
Photo by: Erik Junius
McLaren driver Lando Norris made the same observation about a reduced slipstream effect.
“I think me and George had a perfect demonstration of it,” he said. “I didn’t want to let him past while he was on a quick lap, so I screwed him over and had him off a bit! That’s what you do in testing.
“George said it correctly – I definitely think the following part in the corners is an improvement. How much exactly is hard to know, because you’re always on different fuel levels and tyres and stuff.
“And maybe when there are two, three, four, five, six cars ahead it could be quite different again.
“But all of this obviously comes with the deficit of a slipstream effect, and how much that is going to be helping us. So, we can follow closer, but then the slipstream is worse, so there is positive and a negative from it.
“Don’t know which one is the bigger effect at the minute, so we’ll have to wait and see until the first race.”
Be part of the Autosport community
Join the conversationShare Or Save This Story
Related video
Krack: Aston Martin F1 team no longer in “no-man’s land”
Gasly rues costly floor damage from Ocon contact in F1 Japanese GP
How an F1 underachiever became a Japanese political player
Russell: Dirty air is causing F1 helmet turbulence problems
Wolff: Mercedes podium possible but “atrocious first stint” costly in F1 Japanese GP
Why Mercedes’ F1 struggles are different this time
Hamilton: Ferrari F1 switch doesn't need "vindicating"
Antonelli completes maiden Mercedes F1 test
The F1 breakthroughs Mercedes made in Japan - and what's next
How national entries in the first month of the season stack up
COTA: F1 and MotoGP double-header possible but not probable
WRC 2025 rules limbo creating “critical” situation for teams
Top five roles on Motorsport Jobs this week
Why F1 2026 worst case fears could be key to new rules success
How the F1 driver market situation sits for each team with 2025 openings
What's been going wrong for Leclerc in F1's tiny margins qualifying game
What the Chinese GP's highlights reveal about its first F1 race for five years
Subscribe and access Autosport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
Top Comments