Renault: F1 should bring forward 2026 engine rules changes

The current rules are due to remain in place until the end of 2025, and discussions are already underway about what direction F1 technology should take after that.

F1 managing director Ross Brawn has publicly acknowledged that no new manufacturer is likely to join the sport until new regulations come into force.

Abiteboul suggests that Honda's withdrawal indicates that the current rules are not as successful as they should be, and that the change should be brought forward from 2026 in order to encourage other manufacturers to enter.

Honda announced last week that it will stop its F1 programme at the end of the 2021 season, leaving the Red Bull and AlphaTauri teams looking for a new partner.

"I want to be very clear that we take no satisfaction in the Honda situation," Abiteboul told Autosport.

"We need to call it the way it is, it's not a positive development for F1. We want an F1 with car makers, with OEMs, with engine suppliers, and being down to three engine manufacturers is not a positive development.

"We need to draw some clear conclusions from this situation, and it's something I've been urging the governing body to look at more carefully.

"The engine situation is simply unsustainable. In particular from an economic perspective, but also from a technology perspective.

"I am not sure we can afford this perception.

"Either we're capable of changing this perception of the current engine architecture, or probably we need to fast track the adoption of a new architecture, so that we get in a better place in terms of perception again.

"I would expect that this development triggers some harder thinking about the scheduling of the next generation of power trains."

Abiteboul concedes that under the current rules the sport is not attractive to new manufacturers given the resources required to develop a competitive package, especially with the other manufacturers having units developed for over six seasons of racing.

But he also agreed that Honda's stated reasoning for its withdrawal - focusing on its plans to pursue sustainability and carbon neutrality - did not reflect well on F1, and says that F1 as a whole has not effectively promoted its efficiency credentials.

"It's just more evidence that we have failed in putting together the right messaging and the right marketing of these engine regulations, which are mind blowing - there is nothing more advanced in the world in terms of automotive powertrain.

"There is nothing that even gets close to this efficiency level for light vehicles, so that's remarkable.

"But it's just as remarkable to have failed so badly in explaining to the world and getting the world to understand what this is all about, and the windfalls that could impact more mainstream technology.

"It's just the basics of marketing, we need to get the world to know what we're doing, not simply do it and complain about it.

"Every now and then when drivers are talking about the engines, it's to complain, and it's very unfortunate that we have very little opportunity to talk about how amazing the engines are.

"Maybe we need to ask ourselves if we need to have that level of technology in the engines if technology is only deemed to be detrimental to the competitiveness of a team and of a car."