How porpoising has become the biggest F1 2022 headache

For anyone who has following the first pre-season Formula 1 test in Barcelona, there's one word that has popped up more than any this week: porpoising.

For those who had not heard of it before, it is something that has not been around since F1's last ground-effect era in the early 1980s.

But the return to a more heavy bias on the underfloor Venturi tunnels with this generation of cars has meant the phenomenon has once again reared its head.

It results in the cars bouncing up and down on the suspension at the end of the long straights, and it has been something that almost every team has suffered from to a greater or lesser extent.

The biggest factor here is that as the downforce builds, the car is effectively sucked closer to the track.

This leads to flow separation at a certain point and, with downforce then being lost, the car's ride height will momentarily rise. The airflow will then reattach and the cycle begins again as the downforce builds quickly to the tipping point.

The cyclic nature of this can obviously be broken very easily by running the car at a slightly higher ride height.

However, that is not something that teams want to do as that leads to performance compromises. It's here, in this small ride height pocket, where the most downforce can be found.

Teams are therefore now working flat out to understand how best to manage the situation.

No team seems to have escaped the problem, albeit they are suffering from it at different intensity levels.

This can come down to a number of factors, including the fact that, from an aerodynamic perspective, each of them have come up with their own design concepts within a very narrow set of regulations.

This is most appreciable in the design of the sidepods. But you can also transfer this logic to the front wing, floor, underfloor tunnels and diffuser, all of which have a bearing on how they'll be affected.

For example, those that find a better way to artificially seal the edge of the floor with aerodynamic flow structures will likely benefit over those that have not.

This will then potentially allow them to run the car less aggressively from a suspension perspective and get the same net result as those that are running closer to the ground.

And, whilst the regulations have been made more prescriptive in regards to the design of the floor's edge and their flexibility in 2022, teams are already looking for ways to leverage performance with different surface geometries, slots, scrolls and flaps.

George Russell, Mercedes W13

George Russell, Mercedes W13

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

Whilst on the face of it the conundrum faced by the teams might seem to be an aerodynamic one, it's also worth remembering that some of the luxury suspension items of the last few decades that could have helped address the problem have also been taken away for 2022.

The suspension must now be classically sprung, with inerters and hydraulic systems that previously helped with compliance and platform control, now banned entirely.

An area where this might be causing the most issues is in a suspension mode called 'heave', which is the vertical displacement of the car and where teams had made the most gains with hydraulic elements down the years.

Teams will still utilise heave elements in the suspension this year, as evidenced on the front suspension of the Aston Martin, Haas and Ferrari, below. However, they might not offer the ability to fine tune the suspension's responsiveness in the way that teams have become accustomed to.

Haas VF-22 front suspension detail
Ferrari F1-75 front suspension detail

Another variable that has crept into the mix and could be causing the teams more of a headache than they might have considered is the tyres.

F1 has finally bit the bullet and exchanged its 13" wheels for 18" wheels, which has also required Italian tyre manufacturer, Pirelli, to design a tyre with a much shorter sidewall.

Teams have decades worth of experience with the outgoing balloon-like sidewall tyres, which has allowed them to tune their suspension accordingly.

In response to their arrival, the majority of the teams helped with the development of the new tyres, albeit with mule cars that have unrepresentative suspension layouts.

Whilst this might have seemed like a chance to learn about the new rubber, it might equally have led to some false feedback.

Furthermore, from an aerodynamic perspective, which could be critical when we consider the heavier bias towards downforce being generated by the floor, we must consider the tyre's deformation characteristics when loaded.

After all, teams have honed their simulation tools to deal with the effects posed by the phenomenon known as 'tyre squirt' for over a decade.

This has a significant bearing on the performance of the diffuser, as airflow is squirted laterally into its path as the tyre deforms.

Read Also:

Teams have used a variety of different techniques during the previous regulatory eras to help manage this effect, with all sorts of strakes, flaps, slots and fully enclosed holes in the floor ahead of the rear tyre used to push the airflow laterally across the tyre face to reduce its effect.

It had been expected that the shorter sidewall of this generation of tyres would pose less of an issue, as there's simply less deformation due to the sidewall's stiffness.

But, with reduced fidelity from the heave elements it could lead to a much peakier 'tyre squirt' variant as the rear of the car compresses towards the track surface.

It's also understood that the simulations conducted by the teams in CFD and their wind tunnels did not show the level of porpoising that's currently being seen on track, suggesting that there's work to be done both trackside and back at the factory to understand how to deal with the phenomenon.

Ricciardo: McLaren in "good place" amid encouraging F1 test showing
Previous article

Ricciardo: McLaren in "good place" amid encouraging F1 test showing

Next article

Pirelli explains Barcelona F1 wet tyre test

Pirelli explains Barcelona F1 wet tyre test
Why Vasseur relishes 'feeling the pressure' as Ferrari's F1 boss Plus

Why Vasseur relishes 'feeling the pressure' as Ferrari's F1 boss

OPINION: Fred Vasseur has spent only a few weeks as team principal for the Ferrari Formula 1 team, but is already intent on taking the Scuderia back to the very top. And despite it being arguably the most demanding job in motorsport, the Frenchman is relishing the challenge

The crucial tech changes F1 teams must adapt to in 2023 Plus

The crucial tech changes F1 teams must adapt to in 2023

Changes to the regulations for season two of Formula 1's ground-effects era aim to smooth out last year’s troubles and shut down loopholes. But what areas have been targeted, and what impact will this have?

Formula 1
Jan 26, 2023
Are these the 50 quickest drivers in F1 history? Plus

Are these the 50 quickest drivers in F1 history?

Who are the quickest drivers in Formula 1 history? LUKE SMITH asked a jury of experienced and international panel of experts and F1 insiders. Some of them have worked closely with F1’s fastest-ever drivers – so who better to vote on our all-time top 50? We’re talking all-out speed here rather than size of trophy cabinet, so the results may surprise you…

Formula 1
Jan 25, 2023
One easy way the FIA could instantly improve F1 Plus

One easy way the FIA could instantly improve F1

OPINION: During what is traditionally a very quiet time of year in the Formula 1 news cycle, FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem has been generating headlines. He’s been commenting on massive topics in a championship that loves them, but also addressing necessary smaller changes too. Here we suggest a further refinement that would be a big boon to fans

Formula 1
Jan 24, 2023
How can McLaren keep hold of Norris? Plus

How can McLaren keep hold of Norris?

Lando Norris is no longer the young cheeky-chappy at McLaren; he’s now the established ace. And F1's big guns will come calling if the team can’t give him a competitive car. Here's what the team needs to do to retain its prize asset

Formula 1
Jan 24, 2023
What difference did F1's fastest pitstops of 2022 make? Plus

What difference did F1's fastest pitstops of 2022 make?

While a quick pitstop can make all the difference to the outcome of a Formula 1 race, most team managers say consistency is more important than pure speed. MATT KEW analyses the fastest pitstops from last season to see which ones – if any – made a genuine impact

Formula 1
Jan 23, 2023
When F1 ‘holiday’ races kept drivers busy through the winter Plus

When F1 ‘holiday’ races kept drivers busy through the winter

Modern Formula 1 fans have grown accustomed to a lull in racing during winter in the northern hemisphere. But, as MAURICE HAMILTON explains, there was a time when teams headed south of the equator rather than bunkering down in the factory. And why not? There was fun to be had, money to be made and reputations to forge…

Formula 1
Jan 20, 2023
What Porsche social media frenzy says about F1’s manufacturer allure Plus

What Porsche social media frenzy says about F1’s manufacturer allure

Porsche whipped up a frenzy thanks to a cryptic social media post last week and, although it turned out to be a false alarm, it also highlighted why manufacturers remain such an important element in terms of the attraction that they bring to F1. It is little wonder that several other manufacturers are bidding for a slice of the action

Formula 1
Jan 19, 2023