F1 to clamp down on "reverse engineering" of rival cars

The formal commitment is a follow-up to comments made in an interview last weekend by FIA head of single-seater technical matters Nikolas Tombazis in the wake of the Racing Point brake duct case verdict.

Racing Point has made clear that it copied the overall aerodynamic concept of last year's Mercedes W10 from photographs, a practice that has not been addressed by the rules that govern the listed parts that teams have to design themselves.

The FIA wants to ban both tacit cooperation between teams that have a business relationship and legitimately share other technology, as well as the direct stealing of ideas by rivals.

The governing body's commitment was contained in a letter sent this week to the teams by Peter Bayer, the FIA's secretary general for motorsport. The letter also outlined other future initiatives, such as the upcoming ban on special qualifying modes, and changes to the technical regulations governing listed parts.

Because the deadline for changes to next year's technical regulations has passed, unanimity would usually be required, but the letter made clear that with the new Concorde Agreement set to be signed any changes will now fall under the auspices of the revised governance structure.

This requires only eight of the 10 teams to agree, via what will be known as a "super majority" of votes within the F1 Commission.

In the letter Bayer wrote: "We are in full agreement with many of you that it is not the direction that the sport wants to head towards. Additions to Article 22.3 of the 2021 technical regulations will expressly prevent teams from using photography or other reverse engineering techniques to copy large parts of other teams' cars," adding that "designs from the first race of the 2020 season may still form the legitimate basis for further evolution in 2021".

Ferrari boss Mattia Binotto said on Friday that he hoped that the International Court of Appeal hearing on the Racing Point brake duct case would provide further clarity.

"I think that eventually the decision of the International Court of Appeal will open to a wider and broader discussion on the carbon copy car concept," he said. "Which for us is important, and is important as well for the future of F1.

"At the end it's about discussing intellectual property, and I think that intellectual property is a very important asset of a company.

"If someone would somehow copy almost an identical car of the previous year of a competitor, I think the set of regulations should somehow protect the set of regulations itself, and that's why I think at the moment it's important to simply move forward and understand - clarity and transparency for the fairness of the competition and F1 in the future it's important."

Mercedes boss Toto Wolff noted at Silverstone last weekend that copying is rife in the F1 pitlane.

"We saw it last year, on a few occasions," he said. "One of our main competitors with a 3D camera that is quite a thing, you need to have it on your shoulders, scanning our cars, in the garage and outside of the garage. So scanning the whole car, and when you plug that into a computer, it gives you all the shapes.

"And so this technology exists. There is nothing that prohibits that. Everybody has spy photographers sitting on the roofs of the opposite building, we're zooming into the smallest detail on every car, and if we don't want this to happen then we need to close that avenue."