Analysis: BAR Escape Ultimate Penalty

BAR may feel pretty hard done by with their two-race ban for the fuel tank irregularity that was discovered at the San Marino Grand Prix, but FIA's appeal court judges did at least clear the team of the 'deliberate fraud' allegations that their bosses had feared the most

Analysis: BAR Escape Ultimate Penalty

The threat of exclusion from the 2005 Formula One World Championship had been hanging over the case, as that was the recommendation of the governing body for their appeal court judges, but such a Draconian penalty would only have been possible if proof of bad faith had been discovered.

BAR's barrister David Pannick spent much of his court defence pleading with the judges not to hand down the ultimate penalty because he was adamant that the team had not gone out of their way to cheat and mislead the FIA.

In his closing statement, which some could have viewed as a form of plea-bargaining, Pannick even suggested that while the judges may not agree with the team's views on the minimum weight limit rules, it was a world away from 'fraud.'

He said: "There is no evidence that can begin to sustain the grave allegation of their personal integrity. There is no record that BAR-Honda have acted in a way deceptively or fraudulently in a previous occasion."

BAR may have won the battle there to shake off the 'bad faith' allegations, but they did lose the war in trying to claim that BAR truckie Chris Fry's statement to an FIA official on the Sunday night after the race that the car was empty ("That's it!") was merely in response to whether a 'lifted pump out' had been completed.

The judges were also not impressed that BAR had not gone to the FIA to clarify the use of the secondary fuel tank, and the team's decision to count fuel in the collector tank as overall car weight, prior to its operation.

The judges ruled: "It is not possible for the Court to find, on the basis of the evidence that it was provided with, that Lucky Strike BAR Honda deliberately committed fraud, their actions at the time of the emptying procedure of the vehicle after the event, and the fact that they did not use their right in accordance with Article 2.4, to address a request for clarification on the rules to the Technical Formula One Department of the FIA, show at the least a highly regrettable negligence and lack of transparency."

BAR's argument that there is nothing in the Formula One regulations that state cars must be weighed without fuel did not wash with the judges at all - who clearly believed that the 'dry-weight' element exists through a mixture of various regulations, and that proof that cars do not fall below the 600kg limit through computer data and fuel-consumption figures is not satisfactory.

The judges were also insistent that fuel cannot be used as ballast on the car - even though BAR tried to argue that fuel had to count as some of the car's running weight since it cannot run without petrol on board.

BAR may be paying the price for breaking the rules, but all their rival teams will now know for sure that there are no grounds for getting around the minimum weight limit in Formula One - and that emptying the tank after the race, really does mean emptying it.

shares
comments
Analysis: BAR Loss Leaves Button Free
Previous article

Analysis: BAR Loss Leaves Button Free

Next article

Montoya 'Shocked' by BAR Penalty

Montoya 'Shocked' by BAR Penalty
Load comments
The historic clues that offer hints of Hamilton’s next move Plus

The historic clues that offer hints of Hamilton’s next move

OPINION: Uncertainty over Lewis Hamilton's future has persisted since the race direction call that denied him an eighth world title in Abu Dhabi last month. But while walking away would be understandable, Hamilton has time and again responded well in the face of adversity and possesses all the tools needed to bounce back stronger than ever

Formula 1
Jan 26, 2022
What the FIA must do to restore F1’s credibility Plus

What the FIA must do to restore F1’s credibility

OPINION: The first stage of the 2022 Formula 1 pre-season is just over a month away, but the championship is still reeling from the controversial results of last year’s finale. The FIA acknowledges F1 has had its reputation dented as a result, so here’s how it could go about putting things right

Formula 1
Jan 25, 2022
The six F1 subplots to watch in 2022 as a new era begins Plus

The six F1 subplots to watch in 2022 as a new era begins

As Formula 1 prepares to begin a new era of technical regulations in 2022, Autosport picks out six other key elements to follow this season

Formula 1
Jan 24, 2022
Why newly-retired Raikkonen won't miss F1 Plus

Why newly-retired Raikkonen won't miss F1

After 349 grand prix starts, 46 fastest laps, 21 wins and one world championship, Kimi Raikkonen has finally called time on his F1 career. In an exclusive interview with Autosport on the eve of his final race, he explains his loathing of paddock politics and reflects on how motorsport has changed over the past two decades

Formula 1
Jan 23, 2022
Unpacking the technical changes behind F1 2022's rules shakeup Plus

Unpacking the technical changes behind F1 2022's rules shakeup

Formula 1 cars will look very different this year as the long-awaited fresh rules finally arrive with the stated aim of improving its quality of racing. Autosport breaks down what the return of 'ground effect' aerodynamics - and a flurry of other changes besides - means for the teams, and what fans can expect

Formula 1
Jan 21, 2022
Why new era F1 is still dogged by its old world problems Plus

Why new era F1 is still dogged by its old world problems

OPINION: The 2022 Formula 1 season is just weeks away from getting underway. But instead of focusing on what is to come, the attention still remains on what has been – not least the Abu Dhabi title decider controversy. That, plus other key talking points, must be resolved to allow the series to warmly welcome in its new era

Formula 1
Jan 20, 2022
The Schumacher trait that will give Haas hope in F1 2022 Plus

The Schumacher trait that will give Haas hope in F1 2022

Mick Schumacher’s knack of improving during his second season in a championship was a trademark of his junior formula career, so his progress during his rookie Formula 1 campaign with Haas was encouraging. His target now will be to turn that improvement into results as the team hopes to reap the rewards of sacrificing development in 2021

Formula 1
Jan 19, 2022
The “glorified taxi” driver central to F1’s continued safety push Plus

The “glorified taxi” driver central to F1’s continued safety push

As the driver of Formula 1’s medical car, Alan van der Merwe’s job is to wait – and hope his skills aren’t needed. JAMES NEWBOLD hears from F1’s lesser-known stalwarts

Formula 1
Jan 15, 2022