What F1 must learn from FE's attack mode
Formula 1 has not, by and large, pushed the boundaries too far when it comes to adopting new innovations. Its latest, 'harmless', new rule was not received particularly well, but there remains a case for the championship to experiment more
Formula 1 has long resisted radical change, so it's no surprise shivers are sent down many fans' spines when you mention the word gimmicks.
Considering the criticism that has floated around in recent days at the harmless new rule that offers a point for fastest lap, it's little wonder that F1's bosses don't want to go down the route of introducing reversed grids, success ballast or fan boost.
Share Or Save This Story
RB brands Ricciardo/Tsunoda Chinese GP crashes “unnecessary”
Wolff: Mercedes can't just keep living off F1 ‘bright spots’
Sargeant baffled about not being told of illegal F1 safety car overtake
Mercedes plans Miami F1 upgrades as Russell urges back to basics approach
F1’s new points system looks on course to get support it needs
Horner: Wolff should focus on his own F1 problems, not “unavailable” Verstappen
Exclusive: F1 to discuss new points structure
Why F1 2026 worst case fears could be key to new rules success
Alpine confident for 'good news' in Habsburg injury recovery
Ferrari "made too many mistakes" for podium fight at F1 Chinese GP
What is a wildcard in MotoGP and why is it used?
How abruptly slowing down helped WRT to WEC Imola victory
Did F1's new sprint format work?
Chinese Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2024
Why Verstappen's China F1 win was a sideshow to the real battle
How the pursuit of marginal F1 gains caused Sauber's pitstop stumbles
Subscribe and access Autosport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
